Economic approaches and socio-economics

  • What should economics focus on?
  • What can different approaches contribute?
  • Why socio-economics?

Mainstream Economics

  • neoclassical economics
    • scarcity
    • trade-offs
    • marginal thinking
    • incentives
  • mathematical models
    • abstraction
    • assumptions
    • relationships
  • postivist view
    • positive statements
    • can be tested, confirmed
    • read off “reality” from empirical facts

Advantages:

  • rigorous and transparent language
  • results and benchmarks
  • check, wether knowledge claims are logically consistent
  • identify assumptions necessary to obtain a particular outcome

But:

  • based on a particular theory of science, logical positivism
  • other approaches:
    • critical realism
    • hermeneutics
  • often less focus on
    • falsification
    • status of empirical facts
    • importance on “positionality” of researcher

How to make sense of reality?

wontfix get from slides

Theoretical lenses

wontfix get from slides

Socioeconomics

  • Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Perspective thinking
  • The economy is not an independent entity separate from society
  • all decisions have political and moral results
  • actors do not have a level playing field
  • markets without regulations and institutions would destruct society
  • economic explanations cannot be reduced to single individuals

Trade and Growth

Correlational Effect clearly present Prebish-Singer Hypothesis Causal effect of trade and growth Instrumental Variable Estimation Stolper-Samuelson Theorem

Environmental Depletion

  • more trade requires more depletion for transportation
  • as countries grow richer they tend to get less polluting
  • empirical data for both sides is present
    • neither direction is proven/can be proven currently
  • pollution haven
    • pollution without large fees
    • not enough empirical data to see if that happens
    • companies which offshore product seem to be cleaner than domestic producers