Globalization | An introduction
- what is globalization?
- enablers of globalization
- first and second unbundling
- loosers of globalization and “political countermovements”
- who wins/loses from second unbundling
- political countermovements
- the end of Hyperglobalization?
What is?
wontfix get quotes from slides
The cost of overcoming distance
Enablers of Globalization
After Baldwin:
3 constraints:
- Goods Trade Costs
- Communication Costs
- Face-to-Face Costs
Steam revolution decreased goods trade costs Information and communication revolution decreased communication costs Face-to-Face Costs still high
Pre-Globalized World
- high trade cost
- high comms cost
- high f2f cost Leading to:
- workers and consumers needed to live close by
- very expensive to import/export goods
- local monopolies (cost was still lower than transportation cost)
- limits the size of the market (no Economy of Scale)
First Unbundling (Steam Revolution)
started in 1820 until 1940 (paused because of WW2)
lower transporation costs lead to:
- geographic expansion, decreased cost of overcoming distance
- turn-over times of capital increase
- quasi-local monopolies disappear
- global markets → mass produciton
- still high comms and f2f costs
Resulting in:
- Global
- global north specialize in manufactured goods
- global south specialize in primary commodities, food products
- division of labour
- the great Divergence
- india/china/africa loose
- europe, and later USA, win
- cities specialize in production of particular commodities
- knowledge and information remains in the cities and factories of the global north
Beyond the first unbundling
Many problems still
- econoomic
- political
- socaial
- cultural
- environmental
- innovation
- urbanization
- trade policies
- slavery
- gunboat diplomacy
general process and contingent historical-geographic factors combine to tell a causal story
Rebundling (World Wars)
- world wars put a stop on global trade and integration
- increased fees, focusing on domestic market
Second Unbundling
- different parts can be produced in different sites
started after 1945
- improvements in transportation
- lower comms cost → global division of labour
- increases turnover time
- faster product life cycles (e.g. fast fashion)
information and knowledge flow between companies and between global north and global south.
Transportation Tech
- commercial jet aircraft
- took off (pun unintended) in 1950s
- containerization
- enabled mass-transportation
- incredibly cheap transport costs
Shift in Production
Tasks, Products, Assembly is split onto many different people/companies not a single producer of e.g. airplanes or phones
Comms Technology
- Satellite and optical fiber technology
- The internet
- Mobile Communication
- Electronic mass media (TV, Radio)
- Intellectual property rights
A third unbundling?
Face-to-Face Costs remain high
- tacit (non-codified) information exchange is still geographically restricted
- high-tech, financial, and creative industries → expert industries
- e.g. Hollywood in LA
Current World
- low trade barriers
- low transport costs (first unbundling)
- low comms cost (second unbundling) → extremely complex global value chains → complex global divions of labour based on job and task outsourcing
Losers of Globalization
Task outsourcing
- old: All steps of the production by one company
- new: Many steps are delegated (offshored) to other companies
Stolper-Samuelson (1941)
Elephant Curvewontfix get from slides
- string re-distributive implications of free trade models
- model predicts, that unskilled workers will be worse off
- establishes absolute losses, not relative losses
Rodriks additions
- There re loosers from trade
- winners need to compensate the loosers
- redistribution is flipside
- wontfix get more from slides
Empirical Studies
- wontfix get from slides
Countermovements
- anti-globalization protests
- economic outcomes are linked to political processes
- string political reaction to increasion precarization
- job insecurity, competition in the labor market
Reactions and its Manifestations
- populist voting
- wontfix what the fuck did I do here?
- Left or Right?
- link to welfare state
- right wing: if generous and open to all residents → turns against immigration
- left wing: if limited to a few market insiders → turns against EU, WTO, global finance
Polanyi’s double movement
- wontfix get image from slides
- after Dani Rodrik, by Polanyi
- there will always be political backlash to every economic decision
- Golden Straightjacket: you have to conform to golden role-model
- Bretton Woods Compromise: after ww2
- global governance: every person (globally) has a vote (also the global south)
Backlash
-
Rodriks suggests a political backlash
-
wontfix what should I put here?
-
split is more about cultural lines, less about economic lines
What now?
- have we reached peak globalization?
- no more increase in globalization after 2008
Key Changes
- similarity to cold war: economic superpowers are fighting over geopolitical power
- “value” of trade is not juts measured by efficiency/profit/revenue but also by e.g. environmental aspects
- move to circular economies / local trade relations → less emissions
- democracy and market based economies not defined by international law → every country can choose for themselves
- wontfix get the end of “in-China for China” from Slides
- stronger focus on “strategic autonomy” and “de-coupling/de-risking” and technological sovereignity
- chips being produced in EU
- server farms being built in EU
- China is not just a competitor, but a geopolitical adversary
- China has almost-monopoly on raw resources for high-tech products (chips, batteries)
Standard Economic Theory
- helps us understand
- benefits of trade
- winners and losers of globalization
- leads to productivity/efficiency gains
- rarely includes political backlashes etc
- maybe higher efficiency per company
- but lower efficiency on marco/global level
- wontfix get the rest from slides