Identical Products

  • compete through price rather than quantities
  • oligopolistic industry
  • equilibrium price depends on homogeneity of products
  • applicable when changes in capacities are easy to make

Bertrand Paradox

  • homogenous products
  • one firm undercuts the others
    • takes most customers
  • other firms have to adjust (or undercut others themselves)
  • strong incentive to undercut everyone
  • strong incentive to keep decreasing until p = MC
    • equilibrium: p = MC
  • just 2 firms are enough to reach equilibrium
  • shows importance of strategic variables (price vs quantity)
  • is a form of Nash Equilibrium
  • criticism:
    • seems unnatural for firms (gentlemen’s agreement)
    • even at equal prices the firms do not share the market 50/50 necessarily

Different Products

  • small differences (still same market)
  • each firm sets it’s own price and takes price of competition as given
  • oligopolistic industry
  • profit maximization:
    • best price to choose
- afterwards same thing for $P_{2}^{*}$ 
- then solve for both unknowns $P_{1}$ and $P_2$
  • result:
    • when firm 2 increases prices, firm 1 should increase prices as well

Graphically

  • Collusion … Cartel price setting
  • related to Dilemma Games
    • it would be best (highest profit) for both companies to collude
    • but competing is always the dominant strategy