Rationality
- assumptions:
- unlimited cognitive resources
- perfect information
- utility maximization
Realistic Decision Making
- don’t have limitless cognitive capacity or willpower
- not entirely selfish
- psychological realism → better predictability
- more realism is not always better
- “all models are wrong, but some are better for what you need”
- problem of Unfalsifiability in psych models
- not a problem in Realistic Decision Theory
- risky decision: optimize for expected value:
- Knightean Uncertainty vs radical uncertainty (not knowing anything)
Choice under Risk
- you know the outcomes and the percentages (lottery setting)
- not just expected value → St Petersburg Paradox
- expected utility more important in decision making
- utility is not a linear function, more like a log function
- not maximizing expected value, but expected utility
- large gains should not be weighted as heavy as small gains
4 Axioms of Rational Behavior
- John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern as the beginnings of game theory
- completeness
- transitivity
- continuitytodo
- independencetodo
- we can find examples against all 4 axioms:
- e.g. Allais Paradox
Decision Making
- person vs situation
- todo
Information Search
- 1 problem recognition
- 2 information search
- internal (memories) vs external (research, availability)
- active progressing is done in Working Memory
Intuition
- intuition depends a lot on the information you have
- shit in - shit out
- the better your inputs (memories, biases, etc) are the better your intuitions are the better decisions you will make
- if you have a bad (inaccurate) gut feeling you can change this with better inputs
- justification only after making a choice → only looking for supporting evidence, not for counteracting arguments
Indifference
- if choices are equal or only marginally different
- problem: infinite decision time, Buyers Remorse
- solution: picking randomly
Others
- asking other people
- e.g. an export on the topic, a friend, a trusted individual
- just speaking it out changes a lot
- outsourcing: coin, person, algorithm,
/dev/random
Dealing with Limitations
- trade off between efficiency and accuracy (Simon, 1957)
- moral wriggle room (putting off a decision)
- e.g. not opening the door to a salesman to say no
Construction
- perception is influenced by
- context factors
- previous experiences
- expectations
- motivations
- framing
- experienced entrepreneurs perceive less uncertainty and are less affected by framing issues
Prospect Theory
- editing phase
- simplify decisions (cutting off branches of decision tree)
- reduce consideration set
- cancelling options out or simplifying
- evaluation phase
- consider values relative to one another
- consideration of probabilities
- value of losses weighted more than value of losses
- utility function is not linear
- Marginal Changes appear with gains and losses
- value is rather wealth changes, not absolute wealth level
- risk-averse for gains, risk-seeking for losses
- gambling addiction
- probability weighting
- overweighting low probabilities, underweighting high probabilities
- overestimate luck, good and bad
- certainty (say 1%, 99%) are undervalued
Heuristics
Mental shortcuts to make judgement quickly and efficiently.
& Aronson el al. 2019, p. 64
- most of the time heuristics are great
- Cognitive Bias Codex
Availability
- if you think of it, it must be important
- not as many people die from shark attacks as from lightning strikes
- but people are worried more of sharks, because they can think of it
- if availability is good or not depends on what your sample is
- emotional events will be more available
- problematic implications:
- anything that is not available is not regarded
- distortion or abuse of public order
- bad allocation of funds
Insensitivity to Sample Size Bias
- failing to appreciate role of sample size
Conjunction Fallacy
- an and gate can only ever reduce the probability
- “certain” combinations are considered more probable than the individual factors, although it can only be more probable
Confirmation Bias
- accepting supporting data as is
- trying to reject disproving data
- “You see what you expect to see”
- Dissonance
- remedy: Devils Advocate, outside counsel
- dark side of dissonance:
- escalation of commitment
- sunk cost fallacy
- irrational ignorance towards relevant information
- ethical dissonance
- overweighting of expensive advise
- discounting of feedback
- just because a bad person said a good thing does not make it bad
- absenteeism
- resistance to change
Examples Confirmation Bias
- thinking a university course is bad, then you perceive it as bad even though you would like otherwise if not told that before
Anchoring
- todo
- price set in beginning is really important