-
cash flow vs earnings
- cash flow = hard facts
- earnings = matter of opinion
-
Consumers are not paying extra for ecological products
- expected ecological consumer behavior did not emerge
- not true for textiles or wood products
- maybe true for small amounts - but not driving any business
- slides 1 17
-
circular economyslides 1 18
-
standardization and certificationslides 1 19
CSR Reporting Key Features
slides 1 24
- difference between “ESG performance” and “ESG reporting”
Effects of CSR Reporting
- enhanced transparency and accountability
- improved stakeholder relationships
- very/most important part of CSR reporting
- Materiality Assesment
- stakeholder communication → Legitimacy Theory
- investor attraction
- customer loyalty
- employee engagement
- very/most important part of CSR reporting
- reputation and brand enhancement
- operational efficiency and cost savings
- is already captured by the companies themselves - not necessary to be included in CSR
- resources optimization
- innovation stimulation
- risk management
- not driving business actively → more of a hygiene factor → Herzberg Theory
- identifying risks
- regulatory compliance
- access to capital
- no tangible difference in cost of capital based on ESG score
- no penalties yet based on ESG score
- impact on future cash flows → future customers care (hopefully) more about sustainability
- sustainable financing
- lower cost of capital
- no tangible difference in cost of capital based on ESG score
- competitive advantage
- market differentiation
- supply chain preference
- influence on corporate strategy
- long-term planning → Strategic Foresight, Scenario Planning
- stakeholder input
- regulatory and compliance benefits
- preparedness for regulations
- policy influence
- employee attraction and retention
- workforce motivation
- talent acquisition
- challenges and costs
- resource allocation
- increased scrutiny
- disclosure of sensitive information
- stakeholder pressure and activism
- investor activism
- management accountability
- legal and ethical compliance
- companies are not ethical by definition - they want to make money
- after Kant - moral = no goal
- the tone at the top is very important
- ethical standards
- legal protection
- companies are not ethical by definition - they want to make money
- global standards alignment
- international recognition
- cross-border operations
- performance measurement and improvement
- help by LLMs → turning qualitative into quantitative
- benchmarking
- continuous improvement
Reptation
- reputation is most important good
- activism and public opinion (also through share value) can build pressure - legislation not so much
Official Stuff todo find name
Supervisory Board and Audit Committee
- slides 1 35
- supervisory board
- board of directors
- audit committee
- responsibilities:
- ethical standards: tone at the top
- it’s always the people that make the business - not the decisions
- ethical standards: tone at the top
todo find title
slides 1 36/37
- difference assurance providers and auditors
- assurance providers are just doing quality assessments, not doing any financial reporting
- handing out certifications, no financial stuff
- assurance providers … technical
- auditor … financial
- all technical should also be seen from a financial perspective
Internal Audit Department
- slides 1 38
- external auditors - independence = internal audit department (but more expensive)
- making sure that information they get is reliable
ESG Rating Agencies
- slides 1 39
- ESG rated funds and ETFs might have poorer performance since the information analyzed is new and interpretation is not yet at the level of the financial information interpertation
- financial information is also “uncertain” - just like ESG data
- with time the ESG funds may be equal if not surpass e.g. the SnP 500 since the ESG information may be analyzed better
Regulatory Authorities
slides 1 40